About RSS





Wednesday, June 21 - 03:26

CO2-market remains attentive; post 2008 price remains at € 20 level

Posted by Jos Cozijnsen in Trading

It seems that market participants didn't come to rest after last Month's price corrections. There is no interest in taking clear positions yet. Trade volumes are low, around 1Mton a day. And the sudden Summer temperatures and the World Championship gets all the attention. The next compliance moment is far away, April 2007. It appears that companies witness theitr own higher emission levels and realize that they better stick to their surplusses. Companies that sold their EUAs in April to banks and power companies are satisfied with their profits.

Buyers take their losses. No one yet knows which and how many companies will be long or short in 2006. It is a matter of assessing economic developments and following weather predictions.
The price level for EUAs after 2008 remains high, around € 20, which shows trust in the carbon markt for the longer term, though trading volumes are limited. Power companies are building their positions for after 2008 slowly.
The Draft Second Allocation Plans (2008-2012), due end of June, don't seem very ambitious yet: some percents sharper than NAP-1, since the European Commisson called for 8% cuts. Market participants seem to expect that the Commission, with the 2005 emission verification reports in their hands, have ample tools to bring member states to strengthen their NAPs and to ensure larger EUA shortage. But it is on the other hand speculative too, since there are many CDM projects in the pipeline that may bring CO2 prices down in the longer term.


Permanent link to this posting  |  e-mail this article  |  post a comment below

Jos:

You say: "The price level for EUAs after 2008 remains high, around euros 20, which shows trust in the carbon markt for the longer term."

This price is higher than the current price levels. Does not the higher future price also indicate that traders expect there to be a shortage of permits after 2008?

Thanks for your comment. Not necessarily: first you need trust in the market and then you will bet your money. As I also wrote, it is speculation to say what the future EUA shortage will be (also role of CER supply). I wanted to underline that 2008 price levels decreased less after May and are more stabile.

Is there anything like a discussion forum somewhere on the ETS and Kyoto end CER's,VER's,AAU's etc?
I'm wondering about those parties that fall short of their engagements, ... they have a penalty of 30% and with penalties of 40€ and 100€/ton short ... Any change other sectors migh get involved in the ETS? Seems like you can more easily attract investors as long as you're in an ETS retained business solution provider as you have a potentially additional incose stream from those certificates... so wouldn't the transport sector want to be in the ETS to attract all those investors? And for governments certificates are sexy too .. because they are not seen as taxes by the public... and biodiversity will be linked to Kyoto reforestation as it seems... I was at Greenweek (open doors DG Environment) and there were some very interesting remarks made in a couple of sessions by Anna van der Heijden from the DG Economy/Forestry.

Posted by: AERTS Sven on Tuesday, June 27 - 03:33
 
 











Select this to confirm the posting
Remember personal info?